Tuesday, January 14, 2020

Monday, September 30, 2013

Dan Croc - Character Profile

Citizenship: Amphian
Ethnicity: Crocodile
Height: 5'6"
Weight: 120 lbs


Dan Croc was born in the small clearing of Edora Pond to the proud parents, Randall and Joanne Croc. Randall was a real estate agent working for the agency run by Mr. Tongus Iguana. Joanne was a stay at home mother, but tended to spend most of her time outside of the house. Ever since Daniel was a child, his parents wanted the best for him, to be the best real estate agent around, but Dan didn't want this. He wanted to make his own mark on the world. He felt that he needed to protect his younger brother, Freddie from his parent's dreams and tended to keep him outside of the house, but Freddie's needy behavior started to drive him further away.

When Dan was in grammar school, he met the only other child his age that live in Edora Pond, Mark Gator. They became quick friends, even though their social class differences would usually cause a barrier between them. Dan tended to be the decision-maker of the group, since Mark seemed to go with the flow, never taking responsibility for his decisions and actions. It was until the day that his parents were taken when Dan truly realized his true self and where the road to his future led him to.

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Speculum

A young man moves into the small town of Charlestown, New Hampshire only to discover its mysterious past. A mirror that not only shows a reflection, an inventor who vanished after the death of his wife, and now a hundred years later a young journalist Corbin James must try to turn these events into the most important story he had ever written. As the mystery unfolds what he discovers will forever change the lives of himself and the residents of the small town.

Saturday, November 3, 2012

Connecticut the Prospect: Minor League Baseball in the Nutmeg State

Connecticut has a strong history in the formation of professional baseball in America. From the birth of the game in Cooperstown to the end of the Reconstruction period to today, the people of the Nutmeg State have supported America's pastime. The National League's first president was a man from Connecticut. The great ballplayers of the Boston Red Sox and the New York Yankees have played on the turf that separate their glorified stadiums. Connecticut was a haven for professional ballclubs during the financial unstable youth of professional sports. After the fall of major league baseball in Connecticut the minor leagues became an avenue that is still followed to this day. The ball park of the New Britain Rock Cats holds onto what makes baseball great. Why we all go to the games? The feeling we get when we see the winning hit? or the snacks and games that are played in between innings? The heart of baseball still lies in the Land of Steady Habits through the spectrum of the minors even if its not the big time.

Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Dragon Ball Z Video game (American)

This post will go into depth about the anime Dragon Ball Z and the video games of the franchise. First thing to say is how effective Dragon Ball Z was with the introduction of mass American fans in Japanese anime. The only downfall to the animated series were the very long "stare-downs" that have been cut in the later edit called Dragon Ball Z Kai. What Kai does is exactly what I would hope to achieve with a more vamped up video game for the franchise. I suggest that Bandai-Namco and Criware go in a new direction toward the creation of their next DBZ fighter.

The first step is aesthetics and to redefine the DBZ franchise through a more powerful orchestral score and more interactive menus. America is very proud of our orchestral work with films over the years and have used music as a medium for expressing emotions. This does not Japan doesn't has emotion in its music, but its not a feel that should go with the series. The past games in the DBZ franchise have been utter disappointments within this model. All we get are corny jazzy rock tunes that become a cacophony of dry tunes that just get old. A newer approach to grasp the intense emotion of the DBZ story through a powerful orchestral score could help. The menus need to have darker palette as well in order to gain acceptance from the older audiences. The palette has always been bright, fruitful colors which made you feel you were playing some children's game on the Wii. DBZ is a very powerful and emotional tale with loads of heart and I feel that it gets dimmed down to a children's tale. The menus should be more interactive in that wherever you are in the storyline should pertain to what the menu looks like. For example: You are at the part of the story when Gohan is about to go to Super Saiyan 2. The menu could have a shot of Hercule and his friends looking at Gohan from a distance. Then when you hit the play button Gohan lets out a burst of energy and Hercule and his friends get swept into the screen. Just these aspects will make the gamer feel immersed within the storyline.

The second step is to improve the design of the character profiles and selection. The gamer wants to feel that they are choosing the right fighter for where they are going. Using fighter classes and showing the power levels of the character in the selection process will allow gamers to make the appropriate matches in battle. What I mean by this is that Frieza should be more powerful than Nappa due to his power level. With this instilled in the game it would allow the true fans of the series experience the true power behind the fighter instead of a streamlined roster of fighters who all have an equal chance of winning. The profiles of the Characters should have basic physical features such as height and weight, race, power level, and fighting style. The fighting style can display if the person is more offensive than defensive or an all around fighter. These statistics would greatly assist the gamer in identifying the right fighter for them.

The third step is developing the storymode. The past games have done interesting ways of showing the story. One mode they need to try is using clips from the series to tell the story with a newly orchestrated score to the scenes. This would continue the aesthetic displayed earlier about having an orchestra with the menu music. The story should encompass most of the television series. The movies could be included to fill in the gaps after you complete the main storyline. This way the gamer feels as if they are progressing with the characters and begin to find favorites amongst the large list of fighters. The show's story is very well done, but yet again with it geared more to middle school children in America it didn't do so well with the older crowd. I feel that if the story is edited to progress like a long mini series the game will succeed in displaying the true essence of the manga. The development of the characters such as Gohan and Vegeta are centerpieces of this great Japanese work. There should be more displaying these aspects of the storyline to add depth to the characters and to have the audience feel sympathy for them.

The fourth step is the environment creation and destruction. The environment destruction in the previous titles such as Ultimate Tenkaichi was a disappointment. All it would show is a short cinematic then show the same trench dug in the same place. There is no real time massive damage. This is a big problem with the games since the anime asks for a game that can create massive craters in the ground or shape the countryside as you see fit. DBZ needs to delve into some innovations from LucasArts like DMM for destructive purposes. What they should do is have a foundation of the level and have feet upon feet of destructible matter on top of it. I personally believe it would be great to get knocked down and see your character create a trench in the ground with their own body. The environment needs to feel more real. This way the battles will get more intense which will allow the gamer to fully immerse themselves within the plot and epicness of the story.

The fifth step is gameplay. Raging Blast took the gameplay into a whole new light. With behind the back 3 dimensional combat. It was a great start, but still has yet to perfect it completely. There are parts of the gameplay that felt slow or the too fast. There wasn't a good medium. The buttons were a bit confusing with the joystick used for special attacks. As the games progressed into Ultimate Tenkaichi they improved and are the way toward making DBZ an enjoyable experience in the gameplay spectrum. The combos are fun to use and the quick combat chains are fun, but some things still need to be improved. The special combo such as special beam cannon. Whenever I would perform this move even if Piccolo was in the air he would all of a sudden be on the ground and my opponent in front of me. These random position shifts made it hard to follow the fight and made things confusing. I feel as if Bandai-Namco and Criware have just touched the surface with what they could develop as a great fighting engine. Even in the combat cutscenes for special attacks they are too quick and leave no impression on the gamer when they are shown unless it's an ultimate move. The Kamehameha shots need to be more epic and with the aesthetic of music, blended with a darker palette, and filter the game will show some rough edges to the fighters.


Saturday, September 1, 2012

The Wolverine Origin Trilogy

This paper will argue for a new direction in comic book films. I suggest a film series that covers the life span of Wolverine before his introduction to the X-Men.

First to start with a critique of the X-men films. I would like to begin with a congratulations to Bryan Singer and his writing team for their films on the X-Men. It is no easy task to combine a bunch of superheroes on one team and Singer's achievement is significant to comic book fans. A few criticisms I have from X-Men and X2: X-Men United is that the spoken accents of the characters were too Americanized. This is seen with Storm who in comic book lore is half American, but lived in Africa most of her life was displayed by Halle Berry with a weak African accent and then erased all together by the second film. The same can be said of Colossus who has an American accent when the character is Russian. Another criticism is the overbearing focus on Wolverine. I understand the technique that the writers were utilizing by using Wolverine as a somewhat audience proxy to be able to learn about Xavier's mansion and his X-Men. I enjoy the banter between Wolverine and Cyclops and a somewhat display of Cyclops' leadership skills.  The mystery of Wolverine's past captured the audience's interest, but I was disappointed on how Wolverine's impulsive behavior was not met with a greater force from Cyclops. Wolverine is my favorite character, but if Cyclops had a stronger appearance it may have displayed some more tension. For the most part the first two films were well done. The third film led by Brett Ratner is a completely other story. I wasn't too impressed by this film for it tried to introduce too many characters toward the end of the film trilogy. The talents of Ellen Page, Hugh Jackman, Halle Berry, Shawn Ashmore, Patrick Stewart, Anna Paquin, and James Marsden were all wasted to an extent. I did like some elements of the plot with the "Cure" incentive for mutants and Rogue's dilemma on becoming normal so she could be with her boyfriend. I enjoyed the Kitty Pryde love triangle that seemed to tear at Rogue even further. Again with too many characters introduced Colossus isn't really developed as a prominent figure in the storyline, but just as someone who can throw Wolverine across a football field. I did like the inclusion of his artistic talents, but I would have liked to see the true comic book romance of Colossus and Kitty Pryde. (It could have been a love triangle between Iceman, Kitty Pryde, and Colossus in which Bobby Drake eventually realizes that Rogue is his true love and not the younger Kitty Pryde. Colossus could show his sensitive side to Kitty Pryde during her heartache for Bobby and those two could have gotten together.) This would have broadened Colossus's role and would have added romantic tension that would have sparked some more interest into the film. I also did not like how Cyclops became a weakened and broken man who just gets killed in the beginning of the film. I am sorry James Marsden, you were an awesome Cyclops and it is terrible that your character ended that way. The good things about this film I would have to say is the powerful emotions behind Professor X's death and the epic killing of the Phoenix by Wolverine ( a powerful scene that haunts him in the film, "The Wolverine") plus the wonderful casting of Kelsey Grammar as the Beast. He would truly still be an awesome Hank McCoy.

Now onto the X-Men Origins: Wolverine film. Director Gavin Hood really seemed to just reinvent the wheel with this film. Sabretooth as Wolverine's brother? I am a true fan of Joe Quesada's Origin comic. They even showed an origin of Sabretooth just recently with him originating in the American South. (Not in Canada) Another continuity concern (Why would James Howlett of Alberta, Canada be fighting in the American Civil War?) This makes no sense at all and marks a reason why I prefer Quesada's story over any other based on Wolverine's origin. The other elements to the film that made it terrible were the surrounding characters such as William Stryker. Why? Oh for heaven's sake is William Stryker there and not Dr. Cornelius. I was pretty upset by this change for the older comics had Dr. Cornelius as the mastermind behind Weapon X. I did enjoy the performance of Hugh Jackman who is Wolverine incarnate! A fine performer and great action hero. I loved the introduction of Gambit, but felt that his character didn't mean anything toward the end. Plus Silverfox and Emma Frost as sisters? Cyclops too! I don't know by the end it all seemed to fall apart. I did not appreciate the use of Will I Am as Wraith. He's not a superb actor, but if you were to put him in there don't give him a weak role. I felt that Kevin Durand as the Blob was mostly a character for some exposition and a comical boxing match. Deadpool was a joke, but Ryan Reynolds was perfect casting. Plus thank the comic book gods for the recent Deadpool film. Ryan Reynolds got what he deserves, a superhero film that is funny, well written and true to his character.

The film series I suggest to be made is with live motion capture animation for two distinctive purposes.
1. So that the viewer feels as if they are immersed within the comic.
2. So that the heights and the weights of the characters are true to their comic book profiles.

I believe with the developing technology of Peter Jackson's WETA studio and ILM's studio will be able to do this effectively. One film to consider is the Adventures of Tin Tin in which I am still stunned by the animation and emotion that can be obtained from the characters.

The story of the films will span over the course of human history from the late 19th century into the 1970s. In my suggestion I have taken into account the great works of Joe Quesada, Chris Claremont, and many other writers and their tales of Wolverine and combined their vision into one chronology before Wolverine joins the X-Men.  The films would have an instilled drama as well as superhero action. Comic books are dramatic pieces and can be used to produce amazing films.

The first film can be called Wolverine: James Howlett. This film would cover the entire Origin comic about James growing up with his two friends and how the rage of Thomas Logan drives them apart. I was incredibly drawn to this book right after I first read it. It is a fantastic read and very well written.

Rose would be the love interest in this film as it covers his life from 1889 - 1906. Rose would be a year or two older than James Howlett. There can be more added to the back story of the Howlett family and the loss of their first son John Jr. The which makes her around 19 years old when Smitty proposes to her. I felt that 1889 would fit well with the year difference between James and his older brother John Jr. who died when James would be eight. I understand that the writers in Marvel were not particularly enthused by Quesada's story, but I feel it's amongst the most plausible scenarios for Wolverine and to show why he seems to have a natural attraction to Jean Grey who is in most respects physically similar to Rose. (red hair, attractive, slender) It also gives the reader a sense of James' humility and affection for those he loves which can seem to get lost amongst the macho mumbo jumbo of the 1990s comics and other writings.

The second film I suggest would be titled Wolverine: Logan. He has no previous memory of his life before the quarry in British Columbia, but continues on into the Canadian wilderness with his wolf pack. This film covers his life from 1906-1950. Silverfox would be the love interest in this film. The only thing that is different is that instead of the love story happening throughout the whole film it only occurs within the first half hour to 45 minutes. This film will encompass both World Wars and show Wolverine's connection to Captain America. The wars roughen him up as he forms a brotherhood with a few soldiers who inevitable die in combat hardening Wolverine's emotions. (The man is surrounded by death!) The film would end with him landing in Madripoor becoming recruited by Landau, Luckman, and Lake for espionage work. He goes and tries to take down some bad guys, but then starts to realize that he wants a life away from the violence. He later finds out that Landau, Luckman, and Lake are a front for the CIA and that he has to work with two other agents to complete a mission. (After stating that this will be his last mission.) In 1947, they meet and use codenames with Logan using Skunk Bear which was a name that his wife, Silverfox affectionaly called him in the beginning of the film. They take down the enemy and recover at a hospital where the female agent finds out she's pregnant. It is later revealed that the agents were Richard and Mary Parker (Peter Parker's parents). Logan says he wants to find a place where the trees only sway to the breeze and not to the temper of a grenade. It is revealed at the end that he finds solitude in Japan.

The third film I suggest would be titled Wolverine: Weapon X. This film covers his life from 1950 - 1975. This part of the journey would show his relationship with Mariko Yashida. The love story again only lasts until half way through the film at the time of her death and Logan's decision to join the CIA once again. He now teams up with Victor Creed codenamed: Sabretooth and takes down some bad guys. He then returns to Canada and teams up with Alpha Flight, a ragtag group of mutants who live in Canada. From there he is discovered and asked to join the Weapon X program. He joins alongside three others (Sabretooth, Agent Zero, and Silverfox). They undergo a memory change process in which their memories are altered. They decide to delete Wolverine's entire memories of Silverfox and notice that he has repressed memories that even with their technology he can't look into. Weapon X is completed and he's sent to take out the Incredible Hulk who is terrorizing the Canadian wilderness. He confronts the Hulk and gets his butt whooped in other words. He continues to fight until the Hulk escapes and the Wolverine is contacted telepathically by Professor X and they meet at a military base in Quebec. He then joins the X-Men.

This kind of trilogy appears as a large project (maybe even too large), but the thing is if the story isn't good enough to show how he grows from being a passionate young boy into the feral beast of the Wolverine.


Friday, June 29, 2012

"Indian Bob" Johnson for induction into the Baseball Hall of Fame


"Consistency may be the hobgoblin of little minds, but it can also make certain ballplayers nigh unto invisible. Indian Bob Johnson never had one of those super seasons that make everyone sit up and whistle. While phenoms came, collected their MVP trophies, and faded, he just kept plodding along hitting .300, with a couple dozen homers and a hundred ribbies year after year...like a guy punching a time clock."
               - Bob Carroll in For the Hall of Fame : Twelve Good Men


"Indian Bob" Johnson was an outfielder for the Philadelphia Athletics, Washington Senators, and Boston Red Sox from 1933-1945, an era dominated by players such as Joe DiMaggio, Lou Gehrig, and Ted Williams and with devastating events such as the Great Depression and World War II. The Athletics during this time period had player greats such as Jimmie Foxx and Mickey Cochrane that both reached the Pantheon of baseball gods due to their offensive greatness with mammoth Home Run numbers and high Batting Averages, but one key attribute that is constantly overlooked by baseball writers (sheer consistency) becomes the strength that Bob Johnson has over his teammates and Hall of Famers of his day.


Background and first season.

Indian Bob started his baseball career at the old age of 27, mostly due to the fact that the Athletics already had three superstar outfielders: Al Simmons, Bing Miller, and Mule Haas. Following are the averages the three men had when on the team since Indian Bob joined professional baseball in 1929.

Player (1929 – 1932) BA H HRs RBIs R OBP SLG
Al Simmons .362 210 32 150 129 .406 .630
Bing Miller .304 150 8 82 72 .356 .450
Mule Haas .309 163 8 68 95 .363 .444
Total Outfield Avg. .325 174 16 100 99 .375 .508
 

 Out of the three outfielders Al Simmons was admitted into the Hall of Fame, but together they were an amazing combination. This is how Bob Johnson performed in the Minor Leagues from 1929-1932. There is a discrepancy in the stats due to the fact that statistics in the minors were not well kept, but for the most part it is to show what Bob could have contributed to the Athletics almost just as well as a few of their outfielders.

 
Minor League Years BA H Hrs RBIs R OBP SLG
Bob Johnson .297 138 19 N/A N/A N/A .495

Keep in mind that in Bob Johnson's first season in the minors he only played 81 games, but as you can see Johnson was doing well in the Minor Leagues before he was brought up in 1933. If it wasn't for the talent of the outfield, he could have been brought up much sooner which could have extended his career by a few years. Defensively Mule Haas and Al Simmons were outstanding both with an average .982 fielding percentage which was amazing for that time period. The Athletics had won two World Series in 1929 and 1930 and lost in an appearance in 1931. By 1932, America hit its lowest point economically with a 25% unemployment rate. America voted in Franklin D. Roosevelt that fall and he started to work on his New Deal. Meanwhile Athletic's manager Connie Mack knew that Al Simmons would become too expensive for him to keep on the team that also had future Hall of Famers Jimmie Foxx and Mickey Cochrane. They were a team to beat in the east. Although the team was doing well, it was the most inopportune time. In 1933 after a deal that sent Al Simmons to the Chicago White Sox, Mack called up the 27 year old Bob, or "Indian Bob" for the fact that he was considered a quarter Cherokee to fill in for Simmons. He was tall around six feet and lean weighing in at 180 pounds. In 1932 on the Philadelphia Athletics AA minor league team he had a .330 BA and 29 HRs, making him the clear choice to replace Simmons.

In 1933, Johnson's first year in the majors, the Athletics ended the season third in the American League with a 79-72 record, the last winning record Johnson will have playing for the Athletics. Jimmie Foxx, the first baseman, batted a .356 BA, 48 HRs and 163 RBI as the catcher Mickey Cochrane batted a .322 BA with 106 BBs and only 22 SOs. These two men caught the eyes of eager spectators, but Indian Bob ended the season with a .290 BA, 21 HRs and 93 RBI and 103 Runs Scored, which compared to Foxx and Cochrane made him appear as an average player, but Johnson was only second in doubles with 44, seven more than Foxx's 37. He was also in the Top 10 within the Major Leagues in Runs Scored, Home Runs, Walks, Extra Base Hits, and OPS, placing him in the same list with greats such as Lou Gehrig, Babe Ruth, Chuck Klein and even Jimmie Foxx himself. Defensively Johnson was in the Top 10 in assists with 16 and also Errors Committed, which may be considered a stat that makes Johnson look bad, but the rookie was in standing with future Hall of Famer Earl Averill in this category as well. In his rookie season, Indian Bob Johnson was 15th on the MVP voting list (tied with his Hall of Fame teammate Mickey Cochrane). Out of 39 Rookie Players that year outfielder Pete Fox from the Detroit Tigers was the only other player that had played enough games around (75% of the entire season) to be considered an equal to Johnson for Rookie of the Year. Pete Fox batted .288 with 13 Triples, 7 HRs, and 82 Runs scored. Johnson and Fox were considerably different players (Fox was more of a small ball outfielder as Johnson was more for power), but Johnson's higher batting average, HRs, doubles, BBs, OBP, SLG, and many other categories would have made him a sure candidate for Rookie of the Year if it was an award granted in 1933. Indian Bob Johnson came in strong and the wheels kept rotating into the rest of his career.

Heart of the Athletics 
The very next year in 1934, Connie Mack continued to disassemble his dynasty and his first candidate to leave was Mickey Cochrane who he sold to the Detroit Tigers before the 1934 season. This hurt the Athletics and even though they had the great talents of Jimmie Foxx, Doc Cramer, Pinky Higgins, and Indian Bob Johnson who hit 34 HRs that year they ended up with a 68-82 record landing 5th in the American League. That very year Indian Bob had a 26 game hitting streak that aided in a few of their victories, but their lack of pitching helped destroy the club. The Athletics only had one starting pitcher that had over a .500 winning percentage and the average ERA amongst the starters was a 4.63 which was high considering the league average was a 4.22. Times were tough for the Athletics, but Johnson persevered. He was within the Top 10 Rankings in the Major Leagues in Home Runs and Stolen Bases and Defensively in Assists and Double Plays turned.

Up until 1935, Bob Johnson would play with Hall of Famer Jimmie Foxx who was becoming an increasingly popular player, rivaling the great Babe Ruth in his mammoth offensive numbers. In 1935, the Athletics went 58-91 finishing 8th in the American League. Their pitching improved slightly, but continued to be below average that hurt the ballclub's chances of making it to the World Series again. Although the Athletics did not do well as a whole, Johnson was voted into his first All-Star Team and actually the first All-Star Team ever in MLB history. After the 1935 season, Connie Mack sold Foxx to the Red Sox for $150,000 about $2.5 million in 2015. Foxx left the failing ballclub and prospered over in Boston, but this left Bob Johnson with a more arduous challenge in Philadelphia as all the walls around him appeared to be crumbling.

In 1936 the 30 year old Indian Bob had to become the leader of the outfield. He hit his career high 121 RBIs and was in the top 10 in triples with 14 as well as in Home Runs. The Athletics ended the 1936 season with a 53-100 record. Their pitching was yet another devastation and three of their starting pitchers had above a 5.00 ERA as well as below a .400 winning percentage. Johnson had 18% of the entire team's RBIs that season (Foxx's average from 1933-1935) and was the only one to have over 100. Johnson's power numbers made him stand out. Within the starting nine Johnson hit 37% of their Home Runs. If you don't think that is an impressive number the year Babe Ruth hit his 60 Home Runs in 1927 he had 40% of his starting nine's Home runs. Johnson was nearly as impressive a Home Run hitter on his team as Babe Ruth was on the Yankees.

The next year in 1937 the Athletics would go on to have a 54-97 record landing 7th in the American League. Bob Johnson continued to polish his craft as well as teammate Wally Moses. Bob would reach the Top 10 in OPS, On Base Percentage, Slugging Percentage, and Walks. Yet again, Bob was the only one on the Athletics to have reached over 100 RBI. Moses and Johnson oddly had the same number of HRs (25) and the same number of Stolen bases (9) and Caught Steals (7), but Johnson beat Moses in On Base Percentage, RBIs, and Slugging Percentage and Johnson played 16 less games than Moses. Moses was voted into the 1937 All Star Team, his only appearance to do so in his career while Bob was excluded. The young Moses would soon fade out having 1937 be his best in his career.

1938 continued the Athletics' hardships, but Johnson's prowess. The team went 53-99 with not a single starting pitcher with a winning percentage at or above .500. Bob Johnson had 113 RBIs when the second highest on his team was Billy Werber with 69. Out of the starting nine he had 24% of their RBIs. Johnson had 30 Home Runs second highest was 17 and ending with over 30% of the entire team's Home Runs. He reached the Top 10 in the Majors in Home Runs and Total Bases and Lead the league in Outfield assists with 21, defeating Joe DiMaggio by 1. Johnson strove to help his team and on June 12, 1938 when the Athletics beat the St. Louis Browns 8–3, Johnson had driven in all eight runs with three home runs (one a grand slam, his second of the month) and a single. At the time the second to ever score all their teams runs in a win. Today Johnson is one of three to ever perform such a task. His contributions to the Athletics are transparent. He was voted as an All Star for the second time and was 17th in the MVP Voting List ahead of Pete Fox, his old teammate Doc Cramer, and future Hall of Famer Lefty Gomez.

The year 1939 can be considered Indian Bob's best as the Athletics continued to struggle to get in at least 60 wins. The average ERA for the starting pitching was a devastating 5.61 ERA as the league average was a 4.20 and it didn't seem to be hopeful for the 33 year old outfielder, but yet again he persevered landing in the Top 10 in the Major Leagues in Batting Average, Runs Scored, Total Bases, RBIs, Walks, On Base Percentage, and OPS (ahead of Hall of Famer Charlie Gehringer) as well as in Outfield Assists (ahead of Joe DiMaggio). Johnson batted an incredible .338 with 23 HRs, 114 RBIs, and 115 Runs Scored granting him an 8th spot on the MVP Voting list ahead of Charlie Gehringer and Hank Greenberg as well as a spot on the All Star Team. The end of the decade was good for Indian Bob.

1940 saw a change in baseball as WWII raged on in Europe and America had yet to decide if they were going to become directly involved. Businesses started to flourish due to the aid that America provided for Britain and the other Allies in the war, increasing employment and therefore crowds. The Athletics went 54-100 and ended dead last in the American League yet again. Johnson was yet again the only player on the team to achieve 100 RBIs, but a young outfielder Sam Chapman was a promising prospect to hopefully get the Athletics on track. Johnson would have a bad year or "off year" batting .268 with 31 HRs and 103 RBIs and 93 Runs Scored. He was only in the Top 10 for Home Runs and in Outfield Assists ahead of the other DiMaggio, Vince. He was voted into another All Star Team, making this his fourth appearance in his first 8 years in the majors.

In 1941 Johnson achieved a milestone. He was the fifth in MLB History to hit 20 or more HRs for nine consecutive seasons behind Babe Ruth, Lou Gehrig, Mel Ott and Jimmie Foxx. Sam Chapman also had a stellar year, giving Indian Bob some Run support with 106 RBIs only 1 less than Bob's 107. The Athletics also reached a goal with a 64-90 record. The first 60 win season in over five years. Things appeared to be looking up for the Athletics or so they did. In December America had just entered into WWII and yet again the Athletics were affected.

In 1942, the eager and young Sam Chapman joined the U.S. Navy and Wally Moses was traded to the Chicago White Sox, leaving Bob to have to fend off for himself yet again. The club did terribly, ending the season with a 54-99 record. Bob was the highest paid player, making about $10,000 that year or around $146,000 in 2015. Joe DiMaggio made $43,750 in 1942 or $638,656 in 2015. Bob felt greatly under-appreciated for his extreme efforts to help his team win games. He had 40% of his Team's Home Runs even though he had a dip with only 13 that year. The club that Bob had to play with was less than average and it was Bob's first season since 1934 in which he did not acquire 100 RBIs marking a low point in his career, but he was still voted an All-Star, his fifth appearance.

After the terrible ending to the 1942 season, Indian Bob wanted more money for the 1943 season that the Athletics were not willing to give him. He asked to be traded and was given to the Washington Senators for a ballplayer and some money. The 37 year old Indian Bob seemed to be on his way out of major league baseball, but he continued to make strives. He was truly the Heart of the Athletics and before he left he had amassed over 997 Runs Scored, surpassing Jimmie Foxx's number of 975. Bob's number became a franchise record for over 50 years until it was beaten by Rickey Henderson in 1993. Indian Bob Johnson tried to carry his below average team to the playoffs with incredible record performances. There is a modern statistic called Runs Created that takes into account all the opportunities the player gave his team to allow Bob to score runs. Throughout Bob Johnson's career on the Athletics the team amassed 7,612 runs created and Johnson alone amassed 1,162 roughly 15.26% of the teams runs created. Jimmie Foxx's percentage on his 11 year run on the Athletics was 13%. Connie Mack once said for his team to win many games, "{It} must get consistent hitting and combine it with good pitching." -Miami Daily News (May 9, 1924). He was able to achieve one half of this formula with the literally beating heart of the Athletics, Indian Bob Johnson, but the lack of the other half could have made him appear as a bad player.

Able Veteran 

In 1943 Johnson joined the youthful team of the Washington Senators. The 37 year old veteran was on a team with the average age of 28. He was the oldest starting outfielder by 9 years. The team was in desperate need of leadership in the outfield in which Johnson provided, enabling the Senators to reach a 84-69 record, finishing 2nd in the American League. Bob didn't bat well in his first season in Griffith Stadium, in which, could have been contributed by the fact that the Athletic's home turf, Shibe Park was a hitter's park and Griffith was more of a pitcher's ballpark. World War II continued to wage on and take away many of the game's best players, but Johnson even though having low numbers, the worst in his career was 5th in the MVP voting list ahead of future Hall of Famers Bill Dickey, Lou Boudreau, and Bobby Doerr. He sadly didn't reach any Top 10s for 1943 in any categories, but this soon changed once a new deal was struck. The Boston Red Sox, seeing the possible remaining talent in Bob Johnson and how he would perform at Fenway purchased his contract from the Washington Senators in a deal that Senators owner Clark Griffith stated as the worst in his career.


A Strong Finish

In 1944, the 38 year old Indian Bob played his first season with the Boston Red Sox. Oddly enough his competition from his rookie year, Pete Fox, was his teammate. The outfield was a mixture of old and young players. Johnson, 38, Fox, 35, and George Metkovich, 23. The Red Sox were in a desperate search for good players since they lost Ted Williams and Dom DiMaggio to involvement in the war. The team did alright ending with an absolute .500 winning percentage with a 77-77 record finishing 4th in the American League, but Bob Johnson continued to show his worth. Although a lot of statisticians say that ballplayers stats were inflated during these years due to the lack of talent, this proves that Johnson and these players are above an average player due to the fact that their stats do rise in one of the game's lowest talented times. Bob Johnson not only had great offensive numbers that granted him the Top 10 spot in Runs Scored, Total Bases, RBIs, Walks, On Base Percentage (3rd), OPS, and Extra Base Hits, as well as in Outfield Assists (4th) with an astonishing 23. He was voted into his seventh and last All Star Game and was 10th in MVP Voting. His stats were considerably better than his teammates such as future Hall of Famer Bobby Doerr and Pete Fox. This year marked the last he was able to acquire over 100 RBIs making this the eighth season he was able to do so in his career.

1945 was a remarkable year as it ended two conflicts, the European and Pacific theaters of World War II. There was a travel ban within the United States in 1945 which highly affected Major League Baseball, in which for the first time since the inaugural All-Star game in 1933 there was not an All-Star team. The Boston Red Sox went 71-83 finishing 7th in the American League. A spot to which Bob was accustomed. Although the 39 year old Bob was the oldest member of the team he still lead his own team in RBIs, HRs, Hits, Triples, and Games Played. He was also in the Top 10 in the Major Leagues in Outfield Assists. Indian Bob was 23rd on the MVP voting list, but although he still continued to show potential Indian Bob retired after the 1945 season.

At the time Indian Bob retired he was 8th in Career Home Runs, 16th in Career Walks, 35th in Career OBP, 19th in Career OPS, 29th in Career RBIs, 20th in Career Slugging, 37th in Total Bases, as well as 3rd in games played in Left Field, 10th in Career Putouts, and 8th in Career Outfield Assists. Keep in mind he only played 13 seasons and held these rankings. He was a seven time all star and was in the voting for MVP six times. He had nine consecutive 20 or more HR seasons and on top of that seven of them were combined with 100 or more RBIs. He lead his team in RBIs for nine seasons. His contemporary fans seemed to see the greatness in Indian Bob through the support he received in MVP and All-Star voting in even his off seasons.  He played in an age when America was at its lowest to when it was growing into one of the world's superpowers and in the chaos of these years, one thing remained constant and that was Indian Bob Johnson.

Sizing up his contemporaries 

One argument a baseball historian and statistician can make is that Indian Bob doesn't deserve to be in the Hall of Fame because he possibly couldn't compare to the greats of his time. Although the sheer numbers of these Hall of Famers look great, when you look deeper Johnson's consistency allows him to surpass some of the greats of his day.

One Hall of Famer would be Chuck Klein from the Philadelphia Phillies. Chuck was brought into the Hall of Fame after a schoolteacher petitioned for his admission in 1980 by the Veterans Committee. Chuck was one year older than Bob and started his career at age 23. Chuck came into the game strong and confident. He was a predominant rightfielder and was one of the greatest hitters of the 1930s. What I have done is take into consideration just how consistency matters to a team as well as to a player's induction into the Hall of Fame. I created two tables each one showing how Chuck Klein and Bob Johnson performed in the first six years of their careers compared to the second six years of their careers.

Chuck Klein 


Years BA Hits Hrs RBIs Runs
1928-1933 .359 202 32 121 116
1934-1939 .293 130 17 72 70
% Decrease 19% 36% 47% 40% 40%



Bob Johnson 

Years BA Hits HRs RBIs Runs
1933-1938 .301 164 27 106 102
1939-1944 .294 153 19 96 92
% Decrease 2.4% 7% 30% 10% 10%



As the astute observer can see Chuck Klein's numbers drop dramatically compared to Bob Johnson's numbers. Klein's previewed numbers dropped at an average of 36.4% from the first six years to his second six years. Bob Johnson's average drop was 11.8%. This goes to prove as Chuck Klein's career plummeted Bob Johnson's gradually declined. Another thing to consider is that Chuck Klein in 1939 was 34 years old as Indian Bob was 38 in 1944, displaying the fact that Johnson was playing at an older age.

Career numbers show some astonishing revelations.

 
Career Totals BA Hits HRs RBIs Runs OBP Total Bases
Chuck Klein .320 2076 300 1201 1168 .379 3522
Bob Johnson .296 2051 288 1283 1239 .393 3501

Chuck Klein has Indian Bob defeated in BA, H, and HRs, but Bob Johnson has Klein beat in RBIs, Runs Scored, and On Base Percentage. Keep in mind that Chuck Klein played 4 more seasons than Bob Johnson and only had 25 more hits and 12 more Home Runs as well as 21 more Total Bases. The average per season for their entire careers: Chuck Klein (103 Games played, 122 Hits, 18 HRs, 71 RBIs, 69 Runs Scored), Bob Johnson (143 Games Played, 158 Hits, 22 HRs, 99 RBIs, 95 Runs Scored). If you added four more years to Bob Johnson's career, he would appear clearly the better player. Chuck Klein just wouldn't compare. Career-wise Bob Johnson was the better offensive player.

4 more years BA H HRs RBIs Runs Total Bases
Bob Johnson .296 2683 376 1679 1619 4577


Let's look at defensive numbers for their careers. Chuck Klein had 194 assists in the outfield. Bob Johnson had 208 assists in the outfield. Chuck Klein's fielding percentage .962 compared to Bob's .968. Chuck Klein had 3,250 Putouts compared to Bob's 4,003. Comparatively Bob Johnson was a better fielder and all together a better hitter. It definitely begs the question then, Why is he not in the Hall of Fame? Why did a schoolteacher from Washington or the Midwest not petition for his involvement? What gives Chuck Klein an advantage?

Chuck Klein was on two All-Star Teams compared to Bob Johnson's seven. Chuck won 1 MVP award and was in the voting four times. Bob didn't win a MVP award and was in the voting six times. Chuck has 8 consecutive 20 or more HR seasons compared to Johnson's 9 and has 5 consecutive 100 or more RBI seasons compared to Johnson's 7.  Clearly Johnson was more consistent and effective.

"In baseball, my theory is to strive for consistency, not to worry about the numbers. If you dwell on statistics you get shortsighted, if you aim for consistency, the numbers will be there at the end."  - Hall of Fame pitcher Tom Seaver. 

As one can see in the comparison of Klein and Johnson that Seaver is correct. Clearly Johnson needs someone to petition for involvement because if Klein is in the Hall of Fame clearly Johnson needs to be there. Consistency can triumph over anything. Just look at one of Aesop's most beloved fables the Tortoise and the Hare and its simple message of slow and steady wins the race. Klein and Johnson are perfect examples of this situation. Klein the eager and steadfast Hare, impulsively jumping from the starting line, but tiring out halfway through as the steady and consistent Johnson walked right passed him. I think its fair to say that the Hare doesn't win that race, but why is the Hare in the Hall of Fame and not the Tortoise. Is it because the Hare exhibited great skill at the beginning and had a higher top speed per mile in the first half of the race than the Tortoise? How is that a fair judgment of skill? Even the simple, but remarkable message of a children's tale can be overlooked just like Indian Bob Johnson. 

Now its not fair to just compare Bob Johnson to ONE of his contemporaries who was voted in later one by a passionate Phillies . How about Joe DiMaggio?  Joe DiMaggio also played only 13 seasons all of them with the New York Yankees. He lost his prime years to the war effort, but was still able to be placed in the Hall of Fame. DiMaggio's Yankees were the complete opposite to Johnson's Athletics. The Yankees were well over .500 every season DiMaggio was on the team and had more than one player who hit over 100 RBIs. Joltin Joe had offensive as well as defensive support with all star pitching. Johnson had 15.26% of his team's runs created as DiMaggio had 14.5%. DiMaggio ended with 1,560 Runs Created as Johnson ended with 1,364. DiMaggio's Yankees created over 10,000 runs when he was on their team as Johnson's Athletics only had about 7,000 runs created to display how much support Johnson really had. On average Johnson's Athletics won 59.3 games a season in his ten year career with them as the Yankees were well over 90 wins a season. An interesting modern statistic is Win Shares, which calculates with an intense formula how many wins a player contributed to his team with his batting and fielding.

 


Team Wins throughout career Win Shares Percentage of Wins Shared
Bob Johnson 828 287 34.6%
Joe Dimaggio 1272 387 30.4%


As you can see Joe DiMaggio's Yankees had about 1.5 times the number of wins Johnson's teams were able to amount, but Johnson ended with contributing a higher percentage of his team's wins. This displays the fact that Johnson's skill was integral to his team's ability to win. He averaged about 22 Win Shares per season when some years his team only amounted 54 or 58 wins. That means in those years Johnson could have contributed to nearly half of his team's wins, which is astounding. When Joe DiMaggio averaged about 29 Win Shares a season when his team mostly had 90 or so win seasons contributing about a third of his team's wins per season. This needs to be considered before moving on to comparing these two stellar players. This is not going to be an argument as to why Joe DiMaggio should not be in the Hall of Fame, but of how Bob Johnson is overlooked when compared to one of the game's greatest players.

At first glance, DiMaggio beats Johnson in nearly every offensive category with a close margin in OBP. DiMaggio's career OBP was .398 as Johnson's was .393. DiMaggio averaged 74 walks for every 162 games as compared to Johnson's 96. Johnson played more career games than the injury prone DiMaggio, and ended up with nearly 300 more walks in his career. This gave Indian Bob's team 300 more chances to bring him to home plate yet not many did.
 
A Sabremetric approach would show that Johnson and DiMaggio were closer than what met the eye. The Secondary Average statistic shows something interesting. Secondary Average is a baseball statistic that measures the sum of extra bases gained on hits, walks, and stolen bases (less times caught stealing) depicted per at bat. This shows the overall offensive effectiveness of a ballplayer. DiMaggio's career number at .373 is compared to Johnson's .370. According to Secondary Average, Johnson is relatively just as effective as DiMaggio. The career batting averages of DiMaggio and Johnson show something different .295 (Johnson) and .325 (DiMaggio), which to the Baseball Writers gives DiMaggio a clear advantage. Comparing Johnson to DiMaggio may seem ridiculous, but consistency still prevails over anything else and the one thing that DiMaggio failed at consistency was his fielding arm.

Joe DiMaggio had a .978 career fielding percentage considered great for the 30s and 40s while Johnson had a .968 fielding percentage considered slightly below average. DiMaggio ended with 153 assists in the outfield with his career high with 22 assists in his rookie season. Johnson ended his career with 208 assists with his career high at 23 at the age of 38 his second to last year in the majors. Johnson's single season low in assists is 11 averaging about 16 a season. DiMaggio's low is 1 in 76 games in the outfield. In 1947 DiMaggio had only 2 assists in 139 games in the outfield exposing great inconsistency. Now outfield assists can be determined on the pitching, opposing hitting, and the size of the home ballpark, but Johnson's assist numbers are oddly consistent considering he played in three different ballparks as DiMaggio's fluctuated greatly within only one home ballpark. DiMaggio is the definite better fielder, but Johnson's arm was better than Joltin' Joe's and more consistent. Taking consistency into this situation, Johnson was just as incredibly consistent offensively as he was defensively. I am not trying to state that Johnson was as good as DiMaggio overall, but the fact that Johnson prevailed in areas that DiMaggio failed. It is to humanize what many people may consider a god in sports and that even a silent ballplayer like Johnson in certain areas of the game is better or just as good.

In 1944 Johnson was on the Boston Red Sox with future Hall of Famer Bobby Doerr. Johnson was 38 and Doerr was 26. The two had tremendous seasons. Doerr ended with a .325 BA with 15 HRs and 81 RBI combined with 95 Runs scored and a .927 OPS. Johnson ended with a .324 BA with 17 HRs and 106 RBI combined with 106 Runs and a .959 OPS. Johnson played 20 more games than Doerr did that year, but was 12 years older than him. If Doerr played the same amount of games he may have had stats identical to Johnson. This shows that Johnson brought his consistency to his later years in the majors and made him a force to be reckoned with his younger counterparts.

Doerr's defensive capabilities were impressive that gave him a ticket to the Hall of Fame, but his offensive numbers are another story. Doerr's offensive numbers are lower than Johnson's and he played 14 seasons in the majors ranging from 19 years old to 33 years old. Doerr and Johnson's career numbers are also very close, but Johnson ended with a higher career BA, OBP, SLG, OPS, RS, RBI, BBs, SBs, and Hits. Doerr only played two more games than Johnson did in his career, but Johnson averaged about 143 games played per season and Doerr excluding his first year which he only played 55 games averaged 139 a season. Johnson played more games and played at the older half of a career as Doerr played at the younger half. Doerr was a second baseman that was exceptional at fielding which was a rarity for his time period, but Johnson was better than Doerr in nearly every offensive category. If Johnson can be compared to Hall of Famers in this light, then why is he not in the Hall of Fame?

Eddie Murray. Who is more consistent? 

Johnson's late entry into MLB makes it hard to find a good age comparison, but one ballplayer that can be matched to Bob Johnson for their sheer consistency is Eddie Murray. Bill James stated in his historic baseball Abstract (2000) that nearly every year in Murray's career was his best due to his consistency. They were both outfielders and infielders with considerable speed with a few differences being that Murray was a switch hitter and played a good percentage of his career as a DH playing mostly into the 1980s while Johnson only batted right handed and was thrown all around the outfield and played forty years before Murray.
In Johnson's 13 year career he ended with a .296 batting average, 288 home runs, 1283 Runs batted in, and 96 stolen bases. Murray's stats within the same timeline (Age 27-39) are a .287 batting average, 314 home runs, 1234 Runs batted in, and 73 stolen bases. This is shown that even though they played in completely different eras around the same age they were very similar players. Murray had been playing in the MLB since he was 21 years old allowing him to progress and mature as a ballplayer and the time period difference can't give us an accurate match-up so we will have to rely on just how consistent are the numbers and not their quality. Johnson was a 7 time All Star when Murray was an 8 time all star, but how did they perform when they were not deemed all-stars. Now let's do a comparison of all star and non all star years.

 
Bob Johnson BA H HRs RBIs R
All Star .300 160 21 98 96
Non All Star .292 156 23 99 94
Percent Difference 3% 2.5% 8% 1.1% 2%


 
Eddie Murray BA H HRs RBIs R
All Star .295 166 26 105 91
Non All Star .283 155 23 89 74
Percent Difference 4% 7% 12% 15% 19%


Now this comparison is not the actual statistics themselves, but to mostly focus on the percent difference in the numbers. This a consistency test. Murray averaged about a 11.4% difference in his numbers from his All Star to his non All Star years. Johnson averaged about 3.2% difference in his numbers. ONLY 3.2% difference that is astonishing! Although Murray was an incredibly consistent player offensively, Bob Johnson throughout his career was more consistent. He was nearly as good in his non all star years as he was in his all star years. Giving an all star performance throughout his entire career. This begs to ask that defining question in this argument, Why is he not in the Hall of Fame?


Johnson and Murray - Hall of Fame comparison  

The two distinct baseball eras of the 1930s and 40s and the 1970s and 80s make it nearly impossible to truly compare Johnson and Murray, but how did they compare to Hall of Famers in their own eras? One thing that should be noted is that Johnson played during the entirety of World War II. During this period most of the country's best players including, DiMaggio, Williams, Musial, Feller, and many others left to fight in Europe, leaving Johnson to play against lower level talent. During WWII, above average ballplayer's experienced an inflation in their numbers, and without surprise Johnson's numbers spiked during this time.

On the following graph that I have provided you can see Johnson's and Murray's batting averages compared to the league average throughout their careers.

 
As one can see Johnson's batting average only dipped down once toward the league average throughout his career. The dip in the league's batting average during WWII 1941-1945, but the greatest difference in the averages occurred in 1939 before America's direct involvement in the war. With Murray's graph which takes place in the same age timeline (ages 27 - 39) you can see that at two points, Murray's batting average went below the league's average and appears more inconsistent. The two men within their own time periods, Johnson appears to be the better and more consistent hitter, but you can't solely base their abilities on just batting average.

The Golden Arm

Bob Johnson was an incredible left fielder and recent statistical compilation completed by baseball-reference.com has posted that Bob Johnson has the most all-time career assists in Left Field with 184. An interesting thing to note is that he had played fewer seasons than all of the players in the top ten of that list, including Carl Yaztremski with 23 seasons, Barry Bonds with 22 seasons, and Zach Wheat with 19 seasons. In All-Time assists in the outfield, Johnson is 44th with 23 Hall of Famers placed ahead of him and at least 14 behind him including Hank Aaron, Willie Mays, Babe Ruth, Richie Ashburn, and Carl Yaztremski. If he played 18 seasons (the same as Hall of Famer Roberto Clemente) with his average 16 assists a season he would have had 288 assists placing him 11th on the list in career outfield assists.
Bill James stated that the best outfield arm in the 1940s could have belonged to Vince DiMaggio or Indian Bob Johnson in his historical baseball abstract (2000). From 1940-1945 Bob Johnson averaged a .977 fielding percentage with 16 assists per season. Vince DiMaggio averaged a .981 fielding percentage with 12 assists per season. It is very close to say as Vince was a better fielder as Bob Johnson had a better arm. One thing to note is that Johnson retired in 1945 and was from the ages of 34-39 all the years passed his prime.


Now to return to Eddie Murray during his career he had to compete with Hall of Famers such as Mike Schmidt, George Brett, Wade Boggs, and his teammate Cal Ripken Jr. Compared to Cal Ripken Jr. from 1981- 1989 Murray stands as the more dominant player. Murray had a higher batting average, On Base Percentage, and Slugging Percentage. He had more hits, home runs, RBIs, Stolen Bases, walks, and games played. The Iron Man surpassed Murray in Runs Scored with about 40 more than Murray. Ripken Jr. was a shortstop throughout most of his career and won 2 Gold Gloves for his fielding prowess. Murray had 3 Gold Gloves at first base.

When you look at his competition from other clubs Murray appears a bit lower. Hall of Famer Mike Schmidt was leading the back half of his career from 1981-1989, but still stayed on pace to keep up with a young Murray. Schmidt is used as a comparison as a corner infielder.

 
1981-1989 BA H HRs RBIs R OBP SLG
Eddie Murray .292 162 27 98 84 .377 .495
Mike Schmidt .276 126 29 90 81 .386 .529


Schmidt also had 10 Gold Gloves at third base compared to Murray's 3, and you can say that Murray could have have more if he wasn't placed as designated hitter. Schmidt retired in 1989 at the age of 39 which accounts for the lower numbers in his stats and only averaged around 130 games a season when Murray averaged around 149. If Schmidt played the same amount of games at the same pace he was going during those ten years, he would have had 60 more HRs, 55 more RBI, and many more walks. Now if you place them how they were at the same age range (25 -33) Murray was from 1981- 1989 the comparison changes.

 
Ages 25-33 BA H HRs RBIs R OBP SLG
Eddie Murray .292 162 27 98 84 .377 .495
Mike Schmidt .268 140 37 100 102 .387 .548


Although the averages look very close, Schmidt outweighs his opponent. He had more HRs, RBIs, over 100 Runs Scored, Walks, less Grounded into Double Plays, and more Hit by Pitches. Murray has him outclassed in batting average and hits. Schmidt also surprisingly had more stolen bases and triples than Murray. Using sabremetrics within the same age timeline such as Secondary Average Schmidt had a .489 compared to Murray's .349. Here the players seem nearly impossible to compare. Mike Schmidt had 467 career Win Shares as Eddie Murray had 437 Win Shares. This may seem close, but Mike Schmidt played 3 fewer seasons than Murray. So if you take the average per season and subtract three years from Murray's total it would look more like 467 - Schmidt and 374 - Murray. Nearly a 100 point difference, which was the difference between Johnson and DiMaggio.

Some Miscellaneous Differences with Eddie Murray and Conclusion

The last stat to include is the recent Wins Above Replacement player stat which takes into account a league average player and how many wins Johnson and Murray had over a league average player in their own time. Within his career Johnson ended with 53.2 Wins above replacement as Murray in the same years 27-39 ended with 43.2 wins above replacement. Johnson was in the Top 10 twice in his career placing 5th in 1939 and 4th in 1944. Murray was in the Top 10 once placing 5th in 1984. Although Johnson did not end with a high Career WAR, his average per season ranked higher than a well seasoned hall of fame worthy Murray in the same time span. This stat is considered the tool to use in order as the true measure of a ballplayer. Johnson rates higher than Murray in both of their league averages clearly making Johnson a better player within his own time period than Murray.

Indian Bob Johnson played in a time of legends and war. Ted Williams, Joe DiMaggio, the Waner Brothers, Jimmie Foxx, and Mickey Cochrane distracted the baseball fan population from a truly talented ballplayer. Johnson was oddly consistent playing just as good when he was elected an All-Star and when he wasn't and compared with a similar offensive player from a different time, Eddie Murray, is oddly more consistent and better overall. One may look at Bob Johnson and see an average player, but he was a player that made it to 7 All-Star Games and was placed into the voting for MVP six times and has the most career assists in Left Field. To be placed in the Hall of Fame a player must have at least played ten years in Major League Baseball. 7 out of those possible 10 years Johnson was an All-Star giving his team 20 HR, 100 RBI seasons. Taking in account all the factors discussed "Indian Bob" Johnson is an obvious choice for selection into the Baseball Hall of Fame.